Dr M in full flow talking to the trees! (image courtesy of Waheed Arshad).
During a recent 2-hour walk in autumnal sunshine, the class collected twigs and leaves from no fewer than 27 genera. And this by no means an exhaustive collection as the Reading campus is home to a very diverse range of native, naturalised and planted deciduous and coniferous trees.
Two species of common deciduous trees are Beech (Fagus sylvatica, Family Fagaceae) and Hornbeam (Carpinus betulus, Family Betulaceae).
These two often confused and when Dr M includes Hornbeam in a test a number of students think Beech, and when Dr M includes Beech, students think Hornbeam!
But really they are very different one from the other when examined more carefully. Put them together and probably there is no confusion, so the trick is to remember the key distinguishing features, of which there are at least three.
The twigs of both look rather similar, the leaves are alternately arranged on the twigs and spreading out flat in one plane, certainly superficial similarities.
But look at the leaves, Beech has smoother, rather glossy leaves, the margin with shallowly undulating teeth, while Hornbeam has rougher, more furrowed leaves, the margin with distinctive double serrations – larger teeth alternating with smaller teeth, rather like a tenon saw (click on the image to see this feature more clearly).
The buds are also helpful, Beech with its long cigar-shaped buds quite contrasting with Hornbeam’s shorter, oval pointed buds.
If fruits are present Beech bears large (1 cm or so long) 3-angled nuts borne in soft spiny husks (cupules – typical of Fagaceae), while Hornbeam has smaller nuts held in leafy bracts (typical of Betulaceae).
So the differences are really quite plain for all to see, never again will students mistake these two…is that a bet?